Evolution, Part VI: Even More Challenges for Evolution

Read Part IPart IIPart IIIPart IV, Part V

Irreducible complexity

Another hurdle for evolution is to explain so-called “irreducible complexity.”  The challenge is how evolution, through small, incremental steps can explain complex systems with many intricate, interdependent parts. Continue reading

Evolution, Part IV: Ape to Man Evolution

Lucy (australopithecus afarensis)

Lucy (australopithecus afarensis)

Read Part IPart II, Part III

One of the most contentious issues within evolution is the idea that mankind evolved “from monkeys.”  According to evolutionary theory, humans and modern apes evolved from a common ancestor five to ten million years ago.1  This theory is based on genetic similarities between humans and apes, estimates from our “genetic clocks,” and a supposed wealth of fossil evidence that shows a gradual shift in physiology bridging the gap between the two.

It is true that the vast majority of biologists, geneticists, and paleoanthropologists accept “ape to man” evolution.  What you may not know however, is that there is significant debate within the scientific community about how this process could have occurred.  Contrary to popular opinion, the evidence supporting this progression is anything but clear.  The neat, clean diagrams shown in text books and discussed in mainstream media are myths.  Even evolutionary scientists admit this fact: Continue reading

Evolution, Part III: The Fossil Record

Trilobite - Evolution, Fossil Record

Read Part I, Part II

Next, we turn our attention to the fossil record.  As stated in Part I, the fossil record does illustrate an increase in complexity over time, from single-celled to multi-celled to more complicated life, as evolution predicts.  But does the rest of the fossil record match up with the evolutionary model? Continue reading

Evolution, Part II: What Genetics Really Tells Us

Evolution: What Genetics Really Tells Us

Read Part I here

While the genetic evidence at first seems like one of the strongest arguments in favor of evolution, it’s ultimately the theory’s largest Achilles heel.  Ironically, the more science has learned about DNA and genetics, the more apparent evolution’s challenges have become. Continue reading

Evolution, Part I

Evolution

Logic & Light has touched on the issue of evolution in several posts.  But since this topic is of such importance, a more in-depth, multi-part analysis is warranted.

Evolution is a pivotal issue for several reasons.  First, it is the very foundation of the naturalistic worldview.  According to Richard Dawkins, Darwin’s philosophy made “it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist1.”  If evolution is not true, naturalism is unquestionably false. Continue reading

The Biblical Argument

In this fifth installment, we continue building the case for belief in the Christian God.  The Cosmological and Teleological Arguments demonstrate a logical, scientific foundation for a general belief in God.  The Anthropological and Covenantal Arguments begin steering us directly to the Christian God.  We now continue down that path with the Biblical Argument.  Continue reading

The Anthropological Argument

Logic & Light has previously explored the powerful evidence for God offered by the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments.  And while these arguments offer a strong, logical, and scientific basis for belief in God, they do not tell us much about who God is or which religion has the correct view of Him.  So, we now turn our attention to those arguments that begin to build the case for a belief in the specific God of the Bible. Continue reading