Evolution, Part II: What Genetics Really Tells Us

Evolution: What Genetics Really Tells Us

Read Part I here

While the genetic evidence at first seems like one of the strongest arguments in favor of evolution, it’s ultimately the theory’s largest Achilles heel.  Ironically, the more science has learned about DNA and genetics, the more apparent evolution’s challenges have become. Continue reading

Evolution, Part I

Evolution

Logic & Light has touched on the issue of evolution in several posts.  But since this topic is of such importance, a more in-depth, multi-part analysis is warranted.

Evolution is a pivotal issue for several reasons.  First, it is the very foundation of the naturalistic worldview.  According to Richard Dawkins, Darwin’s philosophy made “it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist1.”  If evolution is not true, naturalism is unquestionably false. Continue reading

Dawkins’ Delusions: Part IV

dawkins-iiiHere, we conclude our four-part chapter-by-chapter response to Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion.

Links to other installments:  Part I, Part II, Part III

Chapter 8 Summary

Chapter 8 is Dawkins’ argument for why religion is not just something we should dismiss and ignore but rather actively oppose.  Religion is not just wrong, it’s dangerous. Continue reading

Dawkins’ Delusions:  Part III

dawkins-ivHere, we continue with our four-part chapter-by-chapter response to Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion.  This is part III.

Links to other installments:  Part I, Part II, Part IV

Chapter 5 Summary

In chapter 5, Dawkins seeks to answer how “the anti-factual, counter-productive fantasies of religion” could have developed so universally among mankind from a Darwinian, evolutionary perspective.  After discussing a few theories, Dawkins leans toward the idea that religion did not evolve because it was beneficial, but rather as a by-product of some other characteristic that contributed to survival. Continue reading

Dawkins’ Delusions: Part II

dawkins-iiHere, we continue with our four-part chapter-by-chapter response to Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion.  This is part II.

Links to other installments:  Part I, Part III, Part IV

Chapter 3 Summary

The purpose of chapter 3 is to disprove the various arguments in favor of God’s existence.  Dawkins addresses Thomas Aquinas’ five proofs, the ontological argument, and various arguments from beauty, personal experience, scripture, and admired religious scientists, along with Pascal’s Wager, and Bayesian probabilities. Continue reading

Dawkins’ Delusions: Part I

Links to other installments:  Part II, Part III, Part IV

Part 1:  Introduction

dawkins-iRichard Dawkins is perhaps the most well-known of a new generation of activist atheists that includes Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens.  The God Delusion is his attempt to disprove the “God Hypothesis” and he hopes that “religious readers who open it will be atheists when they put it down.”1.

With over 3 million copies sold, The God Delusion is probably one of the most widely read and influential atheist manifestos available.  It’s definitely not a new book.  However, we felt compelled to address it because it has been so widely read and because its arguments, even though they are poorly constructed, continue to influence people. Continue reading